Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Cory Booker?s Real Mistake

In a press conference Monday, President Obama said he was not attacking venture capitalists but Romney's specific stewardship. (Good thing, too, since venture?capitalists?whose companies sometimes fail donate to his campaign.) The president?s position raises legitimate questions?all of which Romney has been mum about answering. Romney has asserted that business experience will make him particularly qualified to be president at this moment, but what does that mean? Does it mean he knows how to create jobs, which everyone seems to think is the signature issue of this election? That wasn't really Romney?s precise job.?His job was to maximize profits. He was very good at it. Bain even made money when companies collapsed and people lost their jobs, but his career shouldn't be defined by the things that went wrong any more than the president should be defined by the failure of Solyndra. Bain recently released a statement defending itself after the Obama campaign highlighted the losses at another plant once owned by the company: "Despite political attacks that emphasize the few companies that have struggled, the facts are that during Bain Capital?s ownership, revenues grew in 80 percent of the more than 350 companies in which we have invested.? Booker agreed:?"If you look at the totality of Bain's business, they've done a lot to grow business and support business."

royal rumble results sag awards 2012 kyra sedgwick honor killings

Bennett Carroll Solicitors Blog: Surviving your divorce- Chapter 10 ...

Domestic Violence has, in recent years, taken centre stage in the family law dynamic, and appears to be being magnified by an attempt to change the national psyche.

Any allegation of Domestic Violence will inevitably change the way a family law dispute is viewed and managed.

Allegations of Domestic Violence are taken extremely seriously, and alter the entire character of the way the Court process works, so far as that particular matter is concerned.

Two important rules emerge from this:-

(i)??????????????? Make an allegation of Domestic Violence only if it is warranted.

(ii)????????????? Never, never, never admit to or concede an allegation of Domestic Violence if it is inappropriate to do so.

1.???????? MAKING AN ALLEGATION

It is common perception that there must be physical violence, where one party must strike another, in order for an allegation of Domestic Violence to be supported.? This is not so.? Any course of conduct or single act which has the effect of making a reasonable person fearful will be sufficient.? A complaint of Domestic Violence can be made through the Courts, and conducted by the parties or a law firm, or can be made by and conducted through the Police Service.? The Police have wide-ranging powers as a result of complaints or attendance at domestic disputes, to remove the party who seems a threat, to hold them in custody temporarily, and to conduct Domestic Violence applications, regardless of that party?s intentions.

Safety of the parties is paramount and the Police will act to remove any person who seems a threat.

You can also commence Domestic Violence proceedings, and it is reasonably easy to obtain an interim Order, given that Magistrates are far more likely to act with caution until all of the facts are known, and will make Orders (often mutual orders, that is, orders binding both parties), until there is an opportunity to have a hearing on the facts.

There is often pressure on parties to make mutual ?tit for tat? cross applications alleging Domestic Violence. ?This should only be done if the facts support such allegations.

Domestic Violence Hearings and Orders are a major distraction from obtaining final outcomes, and often stand in the way of getting matters resolved.? They can also be an enormous drain on funds, and if allegations are not later proven to be true, will seriously damage your prospects in related Court actions.

Simple things like the hand over of children to spend time with the other parent, become fraught with logistical problems and opportunities for parties to make allegations which ultimately simply waste money and time.?

Parties are often tempted to use Domestic Violence applications and interim Orders as a tool.? This can seriously backfire.? Interim Orders interfere with contact handover and unnecessarily complicate matters, if they are not necessary to regulate the contact of the parties.? They should be resisted as a tactic to ?get at? your Ex. It simply doesn?t work.? It?s a distraction, time and costs waster and can blow up in your face if the facts do not support you.

The parties are often under pressure to make what are called Consent Orders without admission.

This is, in effect, where the respondent (or both parties if there are cross applications) denies the allegation of Domestic Violence, but agrees to be bound by an Order to keep away from and have no contact with the Applicant.

You should resist the temptation to ?nod? to such an Order if the allegations against you are untrue.? These Consent Orders, even without admission, will cause major problems with the conduct of the main Family Court proceedings, and may prejudice or at the very least alter the course of contact with the parties and their children, and affect final resolution of the matter.

Conversely, allegations that are later proven to be unfounded can be seriously damaging to your credibility.?

The message is clear:-

(i)??????????????? only ever make an allegation if it is supported by fact;

(ii)????????????? do not consent to Orders, even without admission, unless it is appropriate to do so.

2.???????? THE COURT PROCESS

Domestic Violence hearings have 3 stages:-

(i)??????????????? Initial Order;

(ii)????????????? Interim Orders and Interim hearings;

(iii)???????????? Final Orders.*

3.???????? INITIAL PERIOD

Domestic violence orders can be initiated by one of other of the parties.? The process involves filing an application in the appropriate court and your adviser can draft the material for you. Often though the process starts with an event of violence or a domestic incident.

Police Officers have the power to obtain initial orders binding the parties until a Court can hear the matter.

This is usually overnight, or for very short periods of time.? Police attending a home will initially try to make a value judgment about removing someone from the site to prevent further possible violence.? If that decision is made then that person will be removed and police will seek to obtain an interim order preventing contact between the parties until a Magistrate can look at the facts.

The parties will then turn up to a ?first return date?. This is the first time that anyone actually looks at the facts.? Prior to this the only focus is on taking precautions to try to ensure that any violence stops.? Police will make that decision out of an abundance of caution and will be concerned about the consequences of not acting.? As a result it is very common for someone to be removed from the scene.

This does not mean that violence is proven.?

It simply provides a circuit breaker for the situation.

4.???????? INTERIM ORDERS AND INTERIM HEARINGS

Regardless of whether the matter is police initiated or by application filed by a party, the matter will then go before a Magistrate who will consider making an interim Order.

As I have previously mentioned, these Orders are made on very conservative grounds, and it is more likely than not, that an interim Order will be made.

Everyone appears at the local Magistrates Court on the morning of the first return date.? There are several possibilities for what happens on that date and it depends upon the attitude of the parties and to some extent the police (and certainly the Magistrate), as to what orders if any are ultimately made.

There are three possibilities:

a)??? there are no orders made and the matter is dismissed (quite rare);

b)??? there are interim orders made and a final hearing date is set;

c)??? there are final orders made by consent.

It is possible though exceedingly rare that no orders are made at this first return date and the parties return to a situation as though police never attended or intervened.? Even if you or your partner withdraw the complaint, the police have the discretion to continue.? They will do so if they believe the complainant is being intimidated or overborne into making a decision to withdraw.

If the matter is not dismissed at this first date, then some orders will be made.

Whatever happens unfortunately there will not be a full examination of the relationship and the facts behind any incident on this first return date.

What will happen is that the parties representatives (or the police prosecutor if the parties are unrepresented), will have a look at the facts as alleged.

There will then be a discussion about whether some orders can be made by consent.

They can take many forms and have lots of variations.? They may in fact contain mutual obligations for the parties to remain away from each other.

If some kind of common ground on order can be found, then consent orders can be made.? These can be interim (until a full hearing can be held), or final.

Interim consent orders are the most common but if there is complete agreement on the way forward then final orders can be made by consent.? DO NOT CONSENT TO FINAL ORDERS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE FULL CONSEQUENCES OF DOING SO.? Final orders have far reaching consequences.? They create obligations and problems which will stand for years.? They are difficult to undo or alter without the consent of your Ex (which may not be given).? Even if the orders are made ?Without Admission?, that is, without conceding that you?ve done anything wrong, they will affect not just the way contact with any children is conducted, it may affect how the rest of the finalization of the relationship is managed.

As I previously stated, there has been a trend in years gone by to encourage the parties to make ?mutual orders without admission?.? This means, so it?s claimed, that the parties effectively agree to stay away from each other without admitting any of the allegations made by the other.? This was a relatively easy way to dispose of the allegations on the first return date, either in an interim sense or in final orders, without going through the whole costly antagonistic process.? This was often sold to the parties as saving costs and ?getting on with the important stuff?.? This is the wrong way to look at what is a very serious matter.

Domestic violence orders can have a major affect on the shape duration and consequences of he entire process of unraveling a relationship.

Think carefully about the instructions you give your adviser.? Do not feel rushed and if you cannot make a decision you?re happy with, keep talking to your adviser and those close to you until you can.? Remember, your adviser is not there to demand that you do various things.? Your adviser is there to explain the law and circum stances to you, and make recommendations to you about what you CAN do.? You adviser is definitely not there to tell you what to do or put problems in your way.

Your adviser is required, after explaining the situation to you, to take and implement your instructions unless they are illegal or unethical.? If your adviser is unprepared to do that then he/she should withdraw and allow you to get another adviser.

Unfortunately some, even senior lawyers, do not know or forget this.

If there is not enough common ground for consent orders then, there may need to be, or the parties may require, an interim hearing.? This is, necessarily, less than a full-on examination of all the facts.? There will be argument from both parties some submissions regarding what Orders, if any, would be appropriate.

It is acknowledged that the parties will not have had any time to gather evidence, collect witnesses and prepare for a hearing.? For this reason final orders are not made on that day.?? You may feel a certain amount of frustration in not being able to ?have your say?.? Ultimately it is best for both parties if the facts to emerge once all the information is to hand and a proper examination of everything can be made.? This takes a little time.

At an interim hearing, the decision to be made is, ?what step will best put the matter into a holding pattern until a full review can be done?.? For this reason interim orders against one or both parties are very common.

It is an unfortunate side effect of this approach that many people have interim orders made against them in circumstances that are very superficial.? People are subject to the stigma of an interim domestic violence order based on only a cursory examination of the facts.? This is traumatizing and is even worse when children are involved.? Trying to explain this process to a small child is extremely difficult.? Contact (now called ?Spending Time?) with children almost universally means contact with the other parent, which, of course, can?t be done under interim or final orders.? Your adviser will have strategies and processes to go in the order to make this work.

The thought of ?engineering? an interim order might be tempting as a way of scoring points against an Ex but it immeasurably complicates the process and will make the prospects of getting a resolution plummet.? It is extremely dangerous to play with this process and there are severe penalties for being caught doing so.? You should only make a domestic violence complaint if there are grounds to do so.

One of the worst features of interim orders is the impression it gives some parties.? All sorts of feelings of revenge, alienation, superiority, and other impressions which act to move the parties further apart, spring from the (often wrong) impression of the rights granted at these interim hearings, to say nothing of the additional costs incurred.

Interim orders will, of necessity mean one party leaving the home, usually at no notice.? This can be a good thing in relationships of genuine fear and danger.? It can be the first real step in a realization that a relationship isn?t working.? It can also harden attitudes.

None of this should enter into your thinking of you are in danger or fear.

If you need to make a call to end violence an intimidation, do it.

If those Orders are not final and by consent, then those Orders will stand but the matter will be set down for a full hearing, and directions will be made by the Court as to dates for preparation and service of material to support or refute the allegations.

5.???????? FINAL ORDERS

At that final hearing, both parties will by then have filed affidavits and setting out their versions of the facts, but both parties will be required to be cross-examined on that material, and answer questions from their opponent?s legal adviser designed to disprove the allegations.

The Magistrate will then decide which version of the facts he or she accepts, and make orders accordingly.? The proof of the allegations is of the civil standard, that is, on the balance of probabilities.? This means that the Magistrate will only have to decide whether it was more likely than not that the allegations are true.? There is no requirement to prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt.?

It is a particular problem for the parties and the Court that most often, these allegations are of conduct between the parties in private, with no other witnesses, and are often alleged to have stretched over a period of time, making dates, times and places difficult to pin-point (and refute).

There is no requirement for corroborating evidence, (that is, some kind of independent evidence, for example, medical evidence, evidence of complaint at the time, or physical evidence), in order for the allegations to be accepted.? This introduces an element of jeopardy and almost chance into the Domestic Violence arena, which is unwelcome by the parties or the Court.? Nonetheless, it is present and has to be dealt with and considered by the parties.

6.??????????? APPEAL

There are only 4 grounds of appeal:-

(i)??????????????? That the Court has allowed evidence that should have been excluded.

(ii)????????????? The Court has excluded evidence that should have been allowed.

(iii)???????????? That the Court misunderstood the law.

(iv)???????????? That the Magistrate so misunderstood the facts as stated, that no reasonable person could have come to the conclusion that he or she did.

As you can see these appeal grounds are quite narrow.

Orders made will be expressed to exist for a particular period of time, and may be very, very specific, covering minimum distances of approach, specific areas or places which are not to be entered, and particular conduct which is not permitted.

On expiry of the orders, they can be extended depending upon the conduct of the parties in the interim.

7.???????? SIDE EFFECTS

Allegations of Domestic Violence can alter the way your family law dispute is conducted.? Matters affecting the children will be delayed, complicated and made far more expensive for all parties, by unfounded allegations.

Likewise, consenting to Orders relating to Domestic Violence, will slow down, complicate and make more expensive, all of the other dealings related to the dispute. ?Orders relating to contact with, maintenance of, and the residence of children will all have to be looked at and made more complicated by allegations made.

If this is required for the safety of the parties or the children then, so be it, and this is quite appropriate.

Using Domestic Violence as a weapon though, is often counter-productive and will harden the attitudes of all of the players to a resolution.? This will increase the chances of the matter becoming one of the 7% or so of disputes that goes to the delay and expense of a full Trial of all the property and children issues.

If you need to make an allegation for Domestic Violence in order to be safe and to make suitable arrangements for children, then do so, and stick to those allegations without watering down or embellishing them.? If not, resist the temptation to make unfounded allegations.

It is essential that, if your relationship has been marked by domestic violence, you take advice on structuring your termination of it and that you have a domestic violence safety plan before you make the break.? You should seek advice on how to do this.?

ama awards 2011 ama awards 2011 uekman uekman music awards music awards giants eagles

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Quiara Alegria Hudes wins Pulitzer Prize for drama

NEW YORK (AP) ? Quiara Alegria Hudes's play "Water by the Spoonful," about an Iraq war veteran struggling to find his place in the world, has won the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for drama, leaving its author in a "daze."

The drama, which was produced last fall at Hartford Stage Company in Connecticut, was called an "imaginative play about the search for meaning" by the Columbia University's prize board on Monday.

"I'm still kind of in a daze about it but I'm very excited," she said by phone from Middletown, Conn., where she is teaching a play writing workshop to undergraduates at Wesleyan University. "I'm really delighted that something that was a little off the beaten path was considered."

Hudes, 34, previously wrote the book for the Broadway show "In the Heights," which won the Tony Award for Best Musical in 2008. Her play "Elliot, A Soldier's Fugue" was a finalist for the Pulitzer in 2007.

She found out she's won the Pulitzer while checking her phone during a break in the class. Hudes says she yelped and some of her students asked her what was wrong. "I think I looked like the blood had drained from my face," she said. "They said, 'Is everything OK?' I said, 'Yes,' and they all applauded."

In "Water by the Spoonful," a soldier returns from war to Philadelphia and struggles to put aside the images that haunt him while his mother, a recovering addict, battles her own demons. It has characters from all around the world because much of it is set in an Internet chat room.

"The play was a new direction for me," said Hudes. "In a really exciting way, I felt like I had been writing for long enough that I really was very sure on why I was writing. But I also had been writing for long enough that I wanted to go in a new direction."

The drama award, which includes a $10,000 prize, is "for a distinguished play by an American author, preferably original in its source and dealing with American life," according to the official guidelines. The production also must have opened during 2011 to be eligible for this year's award.

Hudes graduated from public school in Philadelphia, got her bachelor's in music from Yale University and an M.F.A. in playwriting from Brown University, where she studied with Paula Vogel, the playwright of "How I Learned to Drive." Many of her works are set in north Philadelphia.

In "Water by the Spoonful," Hudes included characters far from Philadelphia ? from places like California and Japan. "As I was writing this play, I felt more at home than ever," she said. "I am myself of a mixed background. I'm half Puerto Rican and half Jewish and so, in some ways, living in many worlds at once is where I feel most at home."

Her other works include "Barrio Grrrl!," a children's musical about a 9-year-old who fancies herself a superhero and which premiered at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in 2009, and "26 Miles," the story of a mother and her sick daughter which premiered at Atlanta's Alliance Theatre in 2009.

"Water by the Spoonful" is the second of a planned trilogy that began with her "Elliot, A Soldier's Fugue," a play about a young Marine coming to terms with his service in Iraq and his father's service in Vietnam. The third part, "The Happiest Song Plays Last," is slated to make its world premiere next year at The Goodman Theatre in Chicago.

Hudes' play beat out two other finalists: "Other Desert Cities" by Jon Robin Baitz, a witty drama about an affluent California couple whose daughter has written a memoir that threatens to reveal family secrets, and "Sons of the Prophet" by Stephen Karam, a play about a Lebanese-American family that blends comedy and tragedy.

Last year's winner was Bruce Norris' "Clybourne Park," a play currently on Broadway that examines race relations and the effects of modern gentrification. Previous playwrights honored include August Wilson, Edward Albee, Eugene O'Neill, Arthur Miller and Tennessee Williams.

Hudes hopes the prize will extend the life of her play and get it mounted in New York and, of course, her hometown of Philadelphia, "which I love to bits."

___

Online: http://www.pulitzer.org

___

Follow Mark Kennedy on Twitter at http://twitter.com/KennedyTwits

toys r us toys r us

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Articles Internet Business Free Blogs PLR Private Label Rights ...

How To Use Clickbank Comes with Master Resale Rights !

"If you an entrepreneur, then you may have heard of Clickbank, especially if you are developing your business online. If you are new to the world of online marketing and methods, Clickbank is an ideal place to start."

Club 400000 Articles Ebooks Free Software Videos PLR Private Label Rights Master Resell Rights MRR


ryan madson louisiana primary syracuse basketball chipper jones chipper jones dancing with the stars cast mickael pietrus

How Online Bookkeeping Services Improve Small Business ...

?

By Natalie Mova

Online Bookkeeping Services are based on web accounting applications, such as Xero. These applications are more flexible and accessible as they allow business owners and their staff to access, to store and update financial data online. Any authorised person can access the financial data stored securely on a server at any time from any PC anywhere in the world.

The downside of the traditional PC based accounting software that is purchased via license is that it is installed on each user?s PC and will not have real time client?s financial information update and share. If the information needs to be accessed by different users at the same time it would have to be physically transferred between PCs. Online accounting suites allow real-time information update and sharing for all users.

Online (?cloud?) based accounting applications can have an unlimited number of authorised accesses granted to the database.

Additionally, installation of the conventional accounting, PC based application is done via external hard disk. Version update of the software is manually controlled and applied by the users. Online website based applications are updated seamlessly with the modern security that safely backs up data. Version updates therefore do not need to be monitored by the customers and data is always secure.

Online Bookkeeping Services offer significant benefits and cost savings in carrying out accounting services for a business.

The initial package includes full extensive range of bookkeeping online solutions such as financial, payroll, tax and process control services at a cheaper cost in one package.

The data is interlinked so there is no need for double or triple entry of the same information, for example financial data for the business such as revenue and expenses will be used to produce profit/loss for the business, this data will also feed and populate appropriate tax return for the business owner. Payroll information will also feed business expenses, so does not need to be entered twice. Once the tax return needs to be submitted, majority of the information should already be populated automatically for your tax return if monthly bookkeeping has been done on ongoing basis. This process reduces operational errors as well as time spent on entering the necessary data into the system.

Bookkeeping services can be outsourced due to mobile and easily accessible application suite to the bookkeeping services professionals elsewhere in the world, allowing the owners time to focus on core aspects of their business. In addition there is no need to ever physically meet your accountant and exchange documents over email, all of the information can be shared and accessed online. This is also a cost saving from an accountants point of view as they are able to service more clients in the same time space, which in turn lowers down the cost of the services accountants provide.

Business owners exercise more control and transparent overview over it?s business?s bookkeeping, as up-to-date financial situation can be viewed real-time any time of the day.

Basic cost savings aside, the online bookkeeping services provide great opportunities for small businesses to forgo hiring office personnel dedicated to bookkeeping or obtain full range of accounting services elsewhere at full cost. The accounting suite enables outsourcing of administrative tasks of tax, payroll and bookkeeping services to the professionals at a cheaper cost letting the business owners concentrate their valuable time on the core business tasks.

Natalie Mova is a Manager at Xsource, a small business outsourcing services provider in Sydney, Australia. Xsource provide online bookkeeping services throughout Australia as well as the site based bookkeeping Sydney service.

xsource.com.au

ground hogs day 2012 goundhog day punxsutawney facebook ipo facebook ipo egypt soccer riot right to work

Jennifer Lopez Enlists Enrique Iglesias For First World Tour

Star planning 60-date trek through U.S., South America, Europe and Asia this summer.
By John Mitchell


Jennifer Lopez and Enrique Iglesias
Photo: Getty Images

With a hot new single, "Dance Again," and an upcoming greatest hits package to promote, Jennifer Lopez is hitting the road this summer, and she's taking Enrique Iglesias with her.

The "American Idol" judge is set to launch a 60-date world tour in South America in June and will be joined by her "Mouth 2 Mouth" duet partner Iglesias. A source close to Lopez told Celebuzz she "is very excited about him joining the tour."

"This will be a huge tour, complete with a lavish set, full band and team of dancers," the source added.

While concert promoter AEG has not confirmed all dates, Lopez and Iglesias will reportedly visit the United States, South America, Europe and Asia this summer after this season of "Idol" concludes. The tour will snake through Venezuela, Chile, Argentina and Brazil before returning to the U.S. for a planned second round of production rehearsals with shows beginning here in mid-July.

Though she went on a brief tour with then-husband Marc Anthony in 2007, Lopez is looking at this trek as her first-ever full-on world tour. "I did a little minitour with Marc right when I was pregnant [with twins Max and Emme]," Lopez told Ellen DeGeneres last year. "We just did, like, 20 shows. But I've never really done the world tour thing."

Iglesias was previously set to join Britney Spears on her "Femme Fatale" tour last year but pulled out just hours after the announcement was made, citing his belief that he was set to be Spears' co-headliner, not her opening act.

Are you excited to see Jennifer Lopez and Enrique Iglesias on the road? Let us know in the comments below.

Related Artists

the chronicle spinal stenosis the forgotten man mike jones just friends chronicle rampart

Monday, April 16, 2012

How would you change Motorola's Xoom 2?

Image
Motorola's Xoom 2 is, undeniably a strong tablet. It was able to beat a Galaxy Tab 10.1 and a Transformer Prime in some of our performance tests, battery life is around nine hours and it's nearly running a pure version of Honeycomb. We're a big fan of that display, but less so its unnatural attraction to fingerprints. As we sit anxiously waiting for Ice Cream Sandwich to make its belated way onto the slate, we want to know: what do you think works, what did Motorola scrimp on and what would you change to make it a better device?

How would you change Motorola's Xoom 2? originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:15:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

wwe royal rumble leon panetta luck sag awards 2012 nominees sag awards pro bowl 2012 roster yamaguchi